OK, why?and again i disagree ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK, why?and again i disagree ...
So in the end, money is really all that matters?house, car, food, taxes school, kids, vacations, if you can do all of that playing ?
you're a pro , in my book of booklets ....
I'm all that. Except for the LAST partYes, this exactly. If you learn the material and play it well consistently, show up unimpaired, on time and dressed appropriately, treat everyone with respect, do the hang with grace and humor, and refrain from acting like an asshat, you're a pro.
If you search this forum for that topic, you'll find results here, here, here, here, here, and here.
Whoa worlds colliding… I played on one of Samuel Andreyev’s albums like 20 years ago maybe?Tinker tailor soldier ..... drummer ?
That’s a bad analogy.I consider anyone that earns a living playing a musical instrument full time to be a professional musician. If you have to work a day job and play shows here and there I don't consider that a professional musician, personally. I mow my lawn once a week, but that doesn't make me a professional landscaper.
I disagree.I've seen again and again enthusiasts saying that someone has to be making their entire living from something to be called professional, which is wrong.
Like a teenager doing odd jobs to pay for driving lessons or something?That’s a bad analogy.
The correct analogy would be someone else paying you to mow their lawn, in which case you would be a professional lawn mower![]()
I disagree.
It is whatever you put as your main source of income on a tax form. If you make 75% of your income as a plumber but earn money at the weekend playing drums, you ARE a professional plumber. Simple as.
This comes up frequently on largely hobbyist chat forums. At the end of the day, almost no one cares, except maybe the tax authorities. It never keeps me awake at night whetherI'm a professional musician, or you are.
I think there is some need for some weekend warriors to call themselves 'professional musicians', which virtually no one else cares about.
None of the professionals players i know have to fill in their work time to survive with other jobs at all.Most of the musicians I know-- professionals-- are having to supplement with other things, but I can't think of anybody with a full blown other career. I think Mel Brown mostly retired from playing for maybe five years and worked as an accountant. I would be having a very direct conversation with anyone who wanted to question his bona fides based on that.
It's an important category for me, it separates the lifers from the hobbyists, it reflects an attitude towards the activity, that goes beyond how much money did you earn.
It's more about knowing they're not, and not wanting anyone else to be. Hence you get these standards that anyone actually in the arts full time knows are fairly ludicrous.
The future is hereJim Thorpe won GOLD for the pentathlon and the decathlon at the 1912 Olympics.
But they took them away because he had been paid $25 a week to play a short time in minor-league baseball.
He got paid which took him from "amateur" and made him a "professional".
They recently reinstated his medals.
A hundred years later.
So maybe we table this discussion for a century and see where we are.
of course not .... but if you want to be considered a pro at anything .... too me , it's got to be your main source of income ...So in the end, money is really all that matters?
read my posts on the 1st page ...OK, why?